Supreme Court GST Car: The freedom and dignity of every individual is paramount in our society. This is especially true for people with disabilities, for whom mobility is not just a means of travel but also a means of self-reliance and progress in life. Therefore, when news of the GST exemption on car purchases became public knowledge.
Supreme Court Seeks Four-Week Response to Petition by Persons with Disabilities
During a hearing on December 1, 2025, the Supreme Court asked the Central Government and the GST Council why the GST exemption for persons with disabilities on car purchases was abolished.
The Court issued notices to both parties and directed them to file detailed responses within four weeks. This issue arose following a petition by a completely blind person, who sought the Legislative Assembly’s intervention regarding the removal of the GST exemption.
| Topic | Description |
|---|---|
| Supreme Court GST Car Case | Petition filed against removal of GST concession for specially-abled persons buying cars |
| Petitioner | A fully visually impaired person seeking restoration of GST relief |
| Respondents | Central Government, GST Council, and other concerned departments |
| Court Order | Supreme Court demanded detailed reply within four weeks |
| Main Demand | Reinstate concessional GST benefit for eligible specially-abled car buyers |
| Legal Reference | Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 – Section 41 |
| Issue Highlighted | Removal of GST concession restricts mobility and independence of differently-abled persons |
| Public Impact | National debate expected regarding fair tax benefits and freedom of mobility |
| Current Situation | GST concession effectively discontinued; reinstatement awaited |
| Future Expectation | If restored, it may support thousands of specially-abled individuals to buy cars |
Serious Question Raised in the Petition: How Has the Right to Mobility Been Affected?
The petition states that previously, persons with disabilities enjoyed a concessional GST rate when purchasing cars, making it financially easier for them to purchase vehicles. However, with the new system, this relief has virtually disappeared.
According to the petitioner, this change adversely impacts the right to free movement of persons with disabilities, as vehicles are more of a necessity than a convenience for them. The court was clearly asked the basis on which the government decided to withdraw this benefit.
Arguments under the Disability Rights Act, 2016
The petition cites Section 41 of the Disability Rights Act, 2016, which requires ensuring easy and safe access to transportation facilities for persons with disabilities.
The petitioner argues that eliminating the GST exemption directly contradicts the spirit of this Act. While the law seeks to simplify travel for persons with disabilities, removing the tax exemption is tantamount to restricting their mobility. Based on this legal basis, the demand for the concession to be restored is being made.
National Debate and Rising Expectations
Following the Supreme Court’s intervention, this issue has become a topic of national discussion. Many social organizations and rights groups believe that increasing the tax burden on persons with disabilities is unjust. Families and parents who purchase vehicles for their children or relatives are also affected by this decision.
This court move raises hopes for relief and justice, not only on a legal level but also on an emotional level. The country will be closely watching the government’s stance in the coming weeks.
FAQs
Q1. Why did the GST concession for specially-abled car buyers get removed?
It was discontinued after recent policy changes and revised taxation structure.
Q2. What is the Supreme Court demanding from the Central Government?
The Court wants a detailed reply within four weeks only.
Q3. Who filed the petition regarding restoration of GST relief?
A fully visually impaired person through advocate Sajal Jain filed it.
Q4. Which law is being cited to support the demand?
The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016 section forty-one.
Q5. How does removal of concession affect differently-abled individuals?
It directly reduces independence and mobility for many affected people.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is based on news reporting and available legal sources. The final decision will depend on the Supreme Court and the government’s subsequent actions. Final confirmation on any policy or tax-related action should be based on official notifications.
