CM Mahila Rojgar Yojana: Hello friends, Hello, today we’re discussing a news story that is both shocking and heartbreaking. The CM Mahila Rojgar Yojana, launched in Bihar in the name of women’s empowerment, is now under serious scrutiny.

The reason is that under the scheme, ₹10,000 each was transferred to the accounts of two poor men instead of the women. When the department realised the mistake, they demanded their money back, but both beneficiaries clearly stated that they were in no position to return the money.

What is the full story behind the CM Mahila Rojgar Yojana?

This case has come to light from the Jale block of Darbhanga district. Under the Chief Minister’s Women’s Employment Scheme, ₹10,000 was to be transferred to the accounts of women associated with the Jeevika group. The scheme’s purpose was to empower women financially and demonstrate that women are the driving force behind development in the state.

However, due to a technical or clerical error, the amount was transferred to the accounts of two men, Nagendra Ram and Balram Sahni, from Ahiari Dakshin Panchayat.

• Both belong to the Mahadalit community.
• They belong to impoverished families.
• They earn their living through daily wage labour.

The sudden appearance of 10,000 rupees in their accounts was nothing short of a miracle. They used this money to pay off old debts, meet their children’s needs, and run their household.

CM Mahila Rojgar Yojana: When the department woke up, a notice arrived.

A short time later, a notice was sent to both of them by the Block Project Manager of Jeevika. The notice clearly stated that the amount was intended for women and had been mistakenly credited to their accounts, demanding its immediate return.

After receiving the notice, the two workers’ troubles increased. They say that

• The government itself sent the money.
• They spent it, considering it their fortune.
• Now they have nothing left to return.
• Politics also heated up, opposition attacked.

This matter has also taken a political turn. The Rashtriya Janata Dal has launched a scathing attack on the government. The party alleges that the election was marked by such haste in vote-driven politics that the money went into the accounts of men instead of women.

• The RJD taunted the government, saying,
• First, the money was sent by mistake.
• Now, letters are being sent demanding the return of the same money.
• This is a stark example of administrative negligence.

After this, the matter was no longer just a technical error, but questions were raised about the government’s transparency and functioning.

The helplessness of the poor and the government’s responsibility.

The most sensitive aspect of this entire matter is that those from whom the money is being demanded back are extremely poor.

• They have no additional income,
• No savings,
• Not future security.

The question arises whether these poor labourers will be made to pay for the government’s mistake. If a scheme launched in the name of women’s empowerment becomes a crisis for someone else, it is natural to question both policy and intention.

CM Mahila Rojgar Yojana: All eyes are now on the government’s decision.

It’s unclear what further action the administration will take if the money isn’t returned. This uncertainty is causing fear and stress for these families.

• All eyes are now on the government to see whether
• It will adopt a humanitarian approach
• Will it take responsibility for its own mistakes?

Or will the burden of the mistake be placed on poor labourers

This case of the CM Mahila Rojgar Yojana illustrates that as important as formulating schemes is, their correct and sensitive implementation is equally crucial.

This is a vivid example of how a small technical error can create a major crisis in the lives of the poor. Now it remains to be seen how the government handles this situation and whether these labourers receive relief.

FAQs

What is the CM Mahila Rojgar Yojana?

This scheme was launched to provide financial assistance to women associated with livelihood groups, encouraging them towards employment and self-reliance.

How did the money end up in the men’s accounts in this case?

Due to a technical or clerical error, Rs 10,000 each was transferred to the accounts of two men instead of the women.

Will the men have to return the money?

At present, a notice has been sent to them, but the final decision will depend on the government and administration’s stance.

Is the government admitting its mistake?

Officials have called it a clerical error, but the situation regarding further action is still unclear.

Disclaimer: This article is based on available news reports and public information. The views expressed herein are not in support of or against any political party or government institution. For any final decision or action, only official information from the relevant department and government should be considered valid.

Also Read:

Bhavantar Scheme: Big Relief for Haryana Farmers as Government Releases ₹380 Crore Under